Pan-Africanism seminar in Addis Ababa

For its first event of 2013, and just a few days ahead of the 20th African Union Summit (January 21-28), the Institute for Security Studies in Addis Ababa organised today, jointly with four other organisations*, a seminar on Pan-Africanism and African Renaissance.

This seminar was the occasion to reveal to the audience that informal corridor talks at the AU foresee either Uganda, or Ethiopia, or at least an eastern African country, as the next President of the AU. And this in the very symbolic year when the Organisation is to celebrate, in May 2013, its 50 year anniversary (The Organisation of African Unity was created in 1963 and replaced in 2002 by the African Union).

Central themes of the presentations, the concepts of Pan-Africanism, and to some extent African Renaissance, were introduced in past, present and future Africa, as tools to advocate for an integrated continent. Participants underlined that although Pan-Africanism was an old concept, born in the early 20th century from anti-colonial movements, it was still to be fostered these days so as to promote the idea of a harmonised continent where citizens could, for instance, be allowed free movement, where AU decisions would be enforced, policies harmonised across the 54 states, and support given to leaders struggling with potential violent destabilisation or full-fledged conflict.

This anniversary year could, yet again, also be the occasion to look for funding alternatives for the AU. Indeed, the organisation largely depends on international donors to operate, with the European Union as one of its major international donors, even though, as underlined by one of the presenters, he who brings the money, brings his influence along.

This seminar was also surprisingly the occasion to unanimously omit the death of Guinea Bissau leader Malan Bacai Sanhá in January 2012. I believe two presenters indeed paid tribute the African leaders who had died in office in 2012 and as one added Gaddafi (died in 2011) to the list, both omitted Sanhá.

What is left, then, of Pan-Africanism? Well, it was said during the seminar that the concept is something we know, we can discuss, but at practising it, we fail.

I indeed believe that we should not fear change, for it will most probably not come just yet.

*Open Society for East Africa (OSIEA), Oxfam International, Centre for Citizen’s Participation of the African Union (CCP-AU), and International Alert

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Predicting the worst, always.

African politics are not trusted to be perennial. Many examples of the continent’s history have showed that a change of leadership can prove unstable. However, the past decade or so has also demonstrated that the trend is shifting towards stabilisation and non-violent modes of succession. Hence, repeatedly arguing that the transitioning African state is at risk of destabilisation or civil war should not be the main component of a political analysis anymore. Often, it should not even be part of the analysis at all.

Here is a link to a pertinent opinion piece criticising, among other things, the unfortunate shortcut too often made that leads from African leaders’ death to national and sometimes regional instability. Last December 12, 2012, after former South African President Nelson Mandela was admitted in hospital for a lung infection and other health issues, Nathan Greffer argued against the idea (which had appeared in UK’s Telegraph) that all hell would break loose in South African politics when Mandela would die. That, in other words, South Africa would end with Mandela, the guardian of “good behaviour” at the ANC.

Interestingly, this argument has been made or suggested a number of times this past year, as 2012 has proved relatively deadly for African leaders (Ghana, Malawi, Ethiopia and Guinea Bissau all lost their acting political leaders). Risks of political relapse are, in some cases, to be considered.  It is not to say that the occurrence of a coup would be absurd, or the idea of unrest totally uncalled for. It is for me (and apparently also for Greffer) rather to say that we could, really, start taking into account that an African state can also outlive its political leadership. Surely though in the case of South Africa, Mandela is no any leader. A key actor of the 20th century, responsible for defeating an abomination of a regime and stabilising a country engaged in civil war, let’s not forget that he still remains a man, a great one, but a man. He might be used as a concept the ANC is surfing on to maintain its legitimacy in the face of accusations of corruption and general mediocre records, his end is likely not to be the end of South Africa as we know it, a country with a strong civil society and institutions to preserve people’s constitutional rights.

Similar considerations were articulated or only hinted in the case of Ethiopia. With Prime Minister Meles’ death in August 2012, observers feared, for instance, a halt, if not the end of the talks to resolve disputes between Sudan and South Sudan. Both actors have indeed heavily relied on Meles’ assistance to meet and seek peaceful solutions to major border issues. It appears, however, that parties are still meeting under the umbrella of new Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn. As for Ethiopia itself, Hailemariam succeeded to Meles in September 2012 and is expected to remain in office until the next general elections in early 2014. Could African politics just be rational?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ghana’s democracy: the everlasting probation.

It’s quite safe to say that Africa’s political processes are often tainted with lack of transparency. Every election period brings its share of wonders, worries, apprehension with regard to the hope of fair and free elections and the grounding of the true liberal democratic system hoped for by all western donors and observers.

First thing first, it is obvious that one round of transparent election does not account for democracy. It’s obvious yet western leaders do seem to be in a rush to compliment the winner, the loser and then to straight away turn their back on the whole thing and pretend that undemocratic matters belong to the past.

Now as I said before it is obvious that one round of transparent election does not account for democracy, it appears that no one has taken the time to define the approximate number of rounds that would be needed to bring about long-lasting peace and satisfaction to political analysts, journalists, and other outside witnesses and shareholders. At least in the case of African elections, and time will tell, probably also in the case of newly respectable Arab regimes. This remark was brought to my mind when reading a Reuters’ piece on the coming Ghanaian general elections. The title “Ghana poll tests Africa’s “model democracy” suggests uncertainty or potential political destabilisation and the introductory paragraph gives it all “Ghana’s cliff-hanger presidential election on Friday will test[1] the country’s reputation as a bulwark for democracy and economic growth in Africa’s so-called coup-belt“. Yet, it is explicitly said here that opposition and ruling party have lawfully succeeded each other in power five times since 1981’s coup. Now, one would have to agree that 1981 was, indeed, only 31 years ago and that Ghana’s democratic system would be a fairly young one.

Yet when you take the case of Portugal, for instance, which fully embraced democracy from 1974, that is to say seven years before Ghana, you do not hear anyone questioning the outcome of its elections, nor did you seven years ago, when Portugal was, too, in its 31st consecutive year of democracy.

Then it all boils down to this: if we are not ready to embrace the possibility of a Southern democracy, why don’t we stop interfering in its politics?


[1] My emphasis.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Condominiums: an Ethiopian Urban Metamorphosis

Condominiums, Addis Ababa, April 2010

Condominiums, Addis Ababa, April 2010

I’ve found in the November edition of the Addis Standard an article I had long been waiting for. The piece thrived to analyse a major and quite recent Ethiopian urban addition: the condominiums. Those buildings were skilfully imagined to offer more and better living conditions to the ever expanding Ethiopian population. The title of the Addis Standard article is negative and threatening, as it should be, but its content unfortunately lacks focus, and in-depth interviews. I would, for instance, have made a difference between condominiums situated inside and outside the capital city—which is where the journalist investigated. I would have also brought up the quality of the buildings themselves.

Condominiums (roughly 4 to 5-floor residential blocks set in large clusters) have started flourishing full speed in many Ethiopian cities some 5 or 6 years ago. This project was initiated by the Ethiopian authorities, who built the houses and then set a system of lottery through which people could become owners in exchange of about 50% of the total production cost of the flat spread out in loans. It is unclear to me whether this system will perpetuate the relative diversity of coexisting classes and populations, but it has the advantage of being one initiative to modernise living conditions. In the case of Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital city, condominiums have come to mushroom (72,000 flats transferred since 2005) firstly in various locations of the city centre where neighbourhoods (mud-made houses and stylish old houses) have been torn down for that very purpose, but also secondly, and in larger proportion, in the mostly isolated outskirts of Addis. Although they are both built with similar structures and concepts, they are not to be strictly compared when assessing their success in constituting new communities.

A well-integrated centre versus a struggling periphery

The clusters situated within the city perimeter are overall better trimmed and served in terms of shops, infrastructures and public transportation. They also logically come in higher rents, as after becoming owners, quite a handful of these lottery-winners put their property for rent. Better inserted in the urban landscape, they are usually in smaller numbers and benefit from better overall organisation. With relatively high prices for the Ethiopian market, they are not accessible to all anymore.

Balderas condominiums, Addis Ababa, November 2009

Balderas condominiums, Addis Ababa, November 2009

Their suburban counterparts, however, share a number of dysfunctions that could be attributed to a miscalculation of global urban strategic planning, or at least delays in implementation. Many of these very large clusters of buildings were erected before the streets meant to serve them, and before shops or transportation means have been dealt with. It results in insecurity and exclusion for a significant proportion of the population, which, having relocated out of the city centre, becomes tributary of an unfamiliar and inhospitable environment.

Blaming the architect

Beyond differences it appears, however, that all condominiums suffer from a common harm that does not seem to be much acknowledged at this time: they are made of poor quality materials and have a tendency to deteriorate very rapidly. It is then likely that, if not well-maintained, they will too soon (in the decades to come) become either insalubrious or downright dangerous to live in. One may wonder if all flats of the project will be delivered before such an issue materialises.

Those residential blocks come from a real need and are a fine way of assessing the issue of overcrowding in underprivileged households, but they require further research and better implementation as they embody real societal modifications to traditional Ethiopian life. These aspects are irrelevant, however, if the issue of “durability” is not soon taken into consideration.

Posted in Ethiopia | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment